Return to Homepage

Cryogenic Cooling Brings High-Speed Cutting to the Aircraft Industry

The boom in giant aircraft is driving a radical transformation in the materials of choice. Suddenly, titanium, nickel-based alloys, ultra-high-strength steels and carbon-fiber composites have to be machined on a large scale and at high levels of productivity. Conventional cooling lubricant concepts can be limited in this environment. So, Hendrik Abrahams, a scientist on the staff of the Institute of Machining Technology (ISF) at Dortmund Technical University in Germany, has examined the potential advantages of cryogenic cooling.

Hendrik Abrahams, a multitude of new materials are currently emerging. When and how did cryogenic technology, i.e. cooling with technical gases, come into play?

Abrahams: Cryogenic cooling is in itself nothing really new, since back in the 1950's there were some initial cooling trials with CO². In the late 1990's, there was a major research project conducted by Columbia University with twelve industrial companies on nitrogen-based cooling. The ISF started off in 2003 with high-alloyed steels, and in the past few years has been doing intensive work on cryogenic cooling when machining special materials like titanium-based and nickel-based alloys. Cryogenic cooling is a wise choice for titanium-based alloys, particularly, because in terms of the blade material our choices are very restricted. Only hard metals can be used for the tools here, since blades made of ceramics and CBN already wear out after a short cutting time. In order to increase productivity levels when machining titanium with hard-metal tools, a responsively matched cooling concept is essential. Here, for example, high-pressure cooling lubrication has proved effective.

What other reasons are there for adopting new cooling concepts?

Abrahams: They enable the useful lifetime of the tools or the cutting speed to be increased, thus upping the productivity of the process involved. This is certainly a highly motivating factor, in the fast-growing aircraft industry, for instance, which because of the rising proportion of carbon-fiber is having to make increasing use of titanium as well.

What cooling concepts have you examined, and with what results?

Abrahams: ISF has conducted trials with flood, high-pressure, CO² snow-jet cooling, plus combinations of cryogenic technology and minimal-quantity lubrication. In the case of Inconel 718, a nickel-based alloy for the high-temperature range, it emerged that with CO² cooling pure and simple the lack of lubrication leads to severe wear and tear. A combination with minimal-quantity lubrication (quasi-dry machining) reduced the wear and tear on open areas, and notch-wear. The success stands and falls, however, with the type of feed involved, the pressure of minimal-quantity feeding and the right choice of cold-resistant minimal-quantity-lubrication oil. Action is still needed here on the design front.

With cryogenic cooling, you're concentrating solely on CO²; what about nitrogen?

Abrahams: It depends on the type of tool cooling system involved. Internal tool cooling, which requires some quite elaborate engineering because coolant boreholes have to be provided, can be implemented only with nitrogen, since nitrogen remains at a temperature of almost --200° C during the entire feed process. For external feed of the coolant through nozzles, both nitrogen and CO² are suitable. When it exits, the CO² is at a temperature of minus 82° C, not as low as nitrogen, but the specific thermal capacity is higher, since the CO² is kept in liquid form until it exits from the nozzle.

What makes you think that cryogenic cooling is a genuine trend and not just a hype, like other, earlier technical developments?

Abrahams: First, the aircraft industry has a significant demand for more efficient processes, and second, from a researcher's viewpoint, we've identified the salient advantages of cryogenic technology as an option for upgrading productivity levels. The interest is there: as evidenced by Premium Aerotec GmbH, one of the sector's leading component suppliers, which has already purchased machines featuring cryogenic cooling and is trialling the technology concerned.

What about the costs involved?

Abrahams: The cost-efficiency of cryogenic cooling depends on the CO² consumption. To reduce the costs for carbon dioxide consumption, we've already conducted studies on how to downsize consumption, where we've proved that with a significantly reduced CO² mass flow -- to be precise from 2.7 to 0.6 kilograms per minute -- machining can be performed with equally good results. When the CO² consumption is optimized and reduced still further, together with significant gains in productivity, it can be assumed that cryogenic cooling will pay off.

Will we be needing new tools for cryogenic snow-jet cooling?

Abrahams: New tools no, but modified ones yes. You can take the tools designed for high-pressure cooling, and adapt their nozzles to the CO² snow-jet in terms of clearance, shape, diameter and where appropriate the position as well.

In other words, what's taking shape here is something that the tool producers have long been urging: intensive cooperation between tool and machine-tool manufacturers?

Abrahams: Now, in the initial phase, the optimum scenario would be a major collaborative project with the machinery manufacturers, several tool producers, a manufacturer of nozzles, and a research institution like the ISF. There's an option here, too, for participating in government-sponsored projects.

The ISF has evidenced the fundamental suitability of CO² snow-jet cooling; are you now focusing on the design details of the important process parameters?

Abrahams: We've already determined some important key statistics, such as possible increases in useful lifetime: the task now is to design-enhance the concept for series production. Here, all the disciplines involved have to work closely together.

Will the machine tools have to be modified?

Abrahams: You need a gas-tight, pressure-proof feed of the CO² snow-jet through the revolver, and in the case of milling through the spindle. The design engineer, however, in contrast to nitrogen-based cooling, with its extremely low temperatures of around minus 200 degrees Celsius, doesn't have to worry about thermo-compensation when designing the machinery. With CO² cooling, it's all pretty simple really: you need a tank in the machine and pressure-proof piping. This kind of cryogenic cooling, then, can be retrofitted with relative ease. So it's also an obvious option for machinery manufacturers who want to gain some initial experience with it. In the case of nitrogen, the entire execution is more complicated.

What do you see as the highlight of your work?

Abrahams: We have proved experimentally that in the case of the titanium-based alloys the wear and tear can also be substantially reduced in comparison to high-pressure cooling. Moreover, effective cooling of the action point and the displacement of oxygen result in reduced influence on the peripheral zones.

Want more information? Click below.

Cryogenic Cooling

Return to Homepage

Copyright © 2017 by Nelson Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction Prohibited.
View our terms of use and privacy policy ::m::